Poughkeepsie City water quality

Updated 2026-10-22 · New York · Affiliate disclosure

We read 14 results from Poughkeepsie City’s 2025 water quality report. No results over a legal limit; 3 above a health goal or guideline.

Serves about 30,639 people · Water system ID NY1330291 · Read the district’s 2025 report (opens in a new tab)

Open this district in the water lookupCompare with your own test results, see the district map and get matched filters.

Results from the 2025 report

Each number is copied from the district’s report and links to the page it’s printed on. Where the report lists several plants, wells or purchased water, the highest is shown.

ContaminantResultHealth goalLegal limitWhat it means
Bromatehighest running annual average · range ND to 26 · listed as a violation in the report · Plant effluent · 2025 report, page 45.97 ppb0.1 ppb10 ppbAbove the health goal60x the health goal
Gross beta (radioactivity)single sample · listed as a violation in the report · Plant effluent · 2025 report, page 44.86 pCi/L0 pCi/L50 pCi/LAbove the health goalThe health goal is zero
PFOA (a PFAS)average · range ND to 3.7 · listed as a violation in the report · Plant effluent · 2025 report, page 41.4 ppt0.007 ppt10 ppt (New York) now; 4 ppt from 2029Above the health goal200x the health goal
Aluminumaverage · range ND to 0.1 · listed as a violation in the report · printed as 32 ug/L · Plant effluent · 2025 report, page 30.03 ppm—0.2 ppm guidelineWithin the guideline
Bariumsingle sample · listed as a violation in the report · Plant effluent · 2025 report, page 40.02 ppm2 ppm2 ppmBelow the health goal
Chlorineaverage · range 1.94 to 3.52 · listed as a violation in the report · Plant effluent · 2025 report, page 42.54 ppmNone set4 ppmBelow the legal limit
Disinfection byproducts (HAA5)highest running annual average · range 2.98 to 4.19 · listed as a violation in the report · Distribution system · 2025 report, page 43.62 ppbNone set60 ppbBelow the legal limit
Disinfection byproducts (TTHM)highest running annual average · range 1.44 to 7.49 · listed as a violation in the report · Distribution system · 2025 report, page 44.4 ppbNone set80 ppbBelow the legal limit
Nitrate (as N)single sample · listed as a violation in the report · Plant effluent · 2025 report, page 40.69 ppm10 ppm10 ppmBelow the health goal
PFOS (a PFAS)average · range ND to 2 · listed as a violation in the report · Plant effluent · 2025 report, page 40.5 ppt1 ppt10 ppt (New York) now; 4 ppt from 2029Below the health goal
Seleniumsingle sample · listed as a violation in the report · Plant effluent · 2025 report, page 42.3 ppb30 ppb50 ppbBelow the health goal
Turbidity (cloudiness)highest measured · range 0.03 to 0.12 · listed as a violation in the report · Plant effluent · 2025 report, page 30.12 NTUNone set1 NTUBelow the legal limit
Chlorateaverage · range 78 to 440 · listed as a violation in the report · Plant effluent · 2025 report, page 4227 ppbNone setNoneNo health limit
Sodiumaverage · range 23 to 560 · listed as a violation in the report · Plant effluent · 2025 report, page 497 ppmNone setNoneNo health limit

Utility results describe the whole system, measured where water enters the pipes, not your tap. Your home’s plumbing can add lead or copper. 1 number we weren’t sure about is held back until a person checks.

What you can do

Nothing here is an emergency notice: if the district has a violation, it must tell customers directly. If you’d like to lower these at your tap, these are the treatments that remove them, and the catalog shows the models certified for each. Ranking is by certified removal; commissions never change the order.

Disinfection byproducts

Found: Bromate

What removes it: Carbon block.

See filters that remove it

Radium and uranium

Found: Gross beta (radioactivity)

What removes it: Reverse osmosis.

See filters that remove it

PFAS ("forever chemicals")

Found: PFOA (a PFAS)

What removes it: Reverse osmosis.

See filters that remove itWhat water filter removes PFAS?

More districts: New York water quality · All states · Something look wrong? Tell us