We read 11 results from Victorville Water District’s 2025 water quality report. No results over a legal limit; 1 above a health goal or guideline.
Serves about 135,983 people · Water system ID CA3610052 · Read the district’s 2025 report (opens in a new tab)
Open this district in the water lookupCompare with your own test results, see the district map and get matched filters.
Results from the 2025 report
Each number is copied from the district’s report and links to the page it’s printed on. Where the report lists several plants, wells or purchased water, the highest is shown.
| Contaminant | Result | Health goal | Legal limit | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chromium-6average · range 0.34 to 0.61 · listed as a violation in the report · Mojave Water Agency wells 1-5 · 2025 report, page 4 | 0.46 ppb | 0.02 ppb | 10 ppb | Above the health goal23x the health goal |
| Chlorineaverage · range ND to 1 · Distribution system · 2025 report, page 3 | 0.74 ppm | None set | 4 ppm | Below the legal limit |
| Chromium (total)average · range ND to 17 · listed as a violation in the report · Wells (system average) · 2025 report, page 3 | 0.7 ppb | None set | 100 ppb | Below the legal limit |
| Copper90th percentile of 50 homes tested, 0 over the action level · printed as N/D ppb · Customer taps (50 samples) · 2025 report, page 3 | Not detected | 0.3 ppm | 1.3 ppm (action level) | Not detected |
| Disinfection byproducts (HAA5)average · range ND to 2.6 · Distribution system · 2025 report, page 3 | 0.4 ppb | None set | 60 ppb | Below the legal limit |
| Disinfection byproducts (TTHM)average · range ND to 17 · Distribution system · 2025 report, page 3 | 5.9 ppb | None set | 80 ppb | Below the legal limit |
| Fluorideaverage · range ND to 1 · listed as a violation in the report · Wells (system average) · 2025 report, page 3 | 0.45 ppm | 1 ppm | 2 ppm | Below the health goal |
| Lead90th percentile of 50 homes tested, 0 over the action level · Customer taps (50 samples) · 2025 report, page 3 | Not detected | 0.2 ppb | 15 ppb (action level) | Not detected |
| Total dissolved solidsaverage · range 37 to 320 · Wells (system average) · 2025 report, page 3 | 166 ppm | — | 500 ppm guideline | Within the guideline |
| Hardnessaverage · range ND to 7.6 · Wells (system average) · 2025 report, page 3 | 2.11 gpg (36 ppm) | — | — | Soft |
| Sodiumaverage · range 21 to 66 · Wells (system average) · 2025 report, page 3 | 45 ppm | None set | None | No health limit |
Utility results describe the whole system, measured where water enters the pipes, not your tap. Your home’s plumbing can add lead or copper. 3 numbers we weren’t sure about are held back until a person checks.
EPA testing for PFAS and lithium
EPA’s own nationwide testing (UCMR 5) found these in Victorville Water District’s water between Jul 2023 and Jul 2024. These are EPA lab results, separate from the district’s report. Anything not listed was not detected.
- Lithium16.5 ppbFound in 5 of 23 samples · highest resultAbove EPA’s health reference level of 10 ppb (a guide, not a legal limit)
Source: EPA UCMR 5 occurrence data. The highest single result is shown; one high sample doesn’t mean every glass is that high.
What you can do
Nothing here is an emergency notice: if the district has a violation, it must tell customers directly. If you’d like to lower these at your tap, these are the treatments that remove them, and the catalog shows the models certified for each. Ranking is by certified removal; commissions never change the order.
More districts: California water quality · All states · Something look wrong? Tell us