We read 39 results from Santa Fe I.D.’s 2025 water quality report. No results over a legal limit; 9 above a health goal or guideline.
Serves about 21,578 people · Water system ID CA3710023 · Read the district’s 2025 report (opens in a new tab)
Open this district in the water lookupCompare with your own test results, see the district map and get matched filters.
Results from the 2025 report
Each number is copied from the district’s report and links to the page it’s printed on. Where the report lists several plants, wells or purchased water, the highest is shown.
| Contaminant | Result | Health goal | Legal limit | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arsenicaverage · range ND to 1.1 · R.E. Badger treatment plant effluent · 2025 report, page 2 | 0.28 ppb | 0.004 ppb | 10 ppb | Above the health goal69x the health goal |
| Chromium-6average · range 0.03 to 0.04 · R.E. Badger treatment plant effluent · 2025 report, page 2 | 0.03 ppb | 0.02 ppb | 10 ppb | Above the health goal1.7x the health goal |
| Copper90th percentile of 31 homes tested, 0 over the action level · Customer taps · 2025 report, page 2 | 0.83 ppm | 0.3 ppm | 1.3 ppm (action level) | Above the health goal2.8x the health goal |
| Gross alpha (radioactivity)average · range 2.22 to 5.08 · R.E. Badger treatment plant effluent · 2025 report, page 2 | 1.08 pCi/L | 0 pCi/L | 15 pCi/L | Above the health goalThe health goal is zero |
| Gross beta (radioactivity)average · range 2.46 to 8.46 · R.E. Badger treatment plant effluent · 2025 report, page 2 | 4.73 pCi/L | 0 pCi/L | 50 pCi/L | Above the health goalThe health goal is zero |
| PFOA (a PFAS)average · range ND to 2.1 · R.E. Badger treatment plant effluent · 2025 report, page 2 | 0.7 ppt | 0.007 ppt | 4 ppt from 2029 | Above the health goal100x the health goal |
| Radium-226average · range 0.1 to 0.15 · R.E. Badger treatment plant effluent · 2025 report, page 2 | 0.13 pCi/L | 0.05 pCi/L | 5 pCi/L | Above the health goal2.7x the health goal |
| Radium-228average · range 0.15 to 1.08 · R.E. Badger treatment plant effluent · 2025 report, page 2 | 0.56 pCi/L | 0.02 pCi/L | 5 pCi/L | Above the health goal30x the health goal |
| Total dissolved solidsaverage · range 490 to 640 · R.E. Badger treatment plant effluent · 2025 report, page 2 | 545 ppm | — | 500 ppm guideline | Above the guideline1.1x the guideline (taste, odor or stains; not a health limit) |
| Aluminumaverage · range ND to 0.02 · printed as 3.31 ppb · R.E. Badger treatment plant effluent · 2025 report, page 2 | 0.0033 ppm | — | 0.2 ppm guideline | Within the guideline |
| Bariumaverage · range 0.08 to 0.11 · printed as 88.5 ppb · R.E. Badger treatment plant effluent · 2025 report, page 2 | 0.09 ppm | 2 ppm | 2 ppm | Below the health goal |
| Chloramineaverage · range 2.49 to 3.01 · Distribution system · 2025 report, page 2 | 2.81 ppm | None set | 4 ppm | Below the legal limit |
| Chlorideaverage · range 110 to 120 · R.E. Badger treatment plant effluent · 2025 report, page 2 | 115 ppm | — | 250 ppm guideline | Within the guideline |
| Coloraverage · range ND to 2 · R.E. Badger treatment plant effluent · 2025 report, page 2 | 1 CU | — | 15 CU guideline | Within the guideline |
| Disinfection byproducts (HAA5)highest running annual average · range 3.5 to 20 · Distribution system · 2025 report, page 2 | 13.4 ppb | None set | 60 ppb | Below the legal limit |
| Disinfection byproducts (TTHM)highest running annual average · range 14 to 47 · Distribution system · 2025 report, page 2 | 33 ppb | None set | 80 ppb | Below the legal limit |
| Fluorideaverage · range 0.19 to 0.38 · R.E. Badger treatment plant effluent · 2025 report, page 2 | 0.28 ppm | 1 ppm | 2 ppm | Below the health goal |
| Lead90th percentile of 31 homes tested, 0 over the action level · Customer taps · 2025 report, page 2 | Not detected | 0.2 ppb | 15 ppb (action level) | Not detected |
| Nitrate (as N)average · range ND to 0.17 · R.E. Badger treatment plant effluent · 2025 report, page 2 | 0.04 ppm | 10 ppm | 10 ppm | Below the health goal |
| Perchlorateaverage · range 0.65 to 0.65 · R.E. Badger treatment plant effluent · 2025 report, page 2 | 0.65 ppb | 1 ppb | 6 ppb | Below the health goal |
| Sulfateaverage · range 130 to 210 · R.E. Badger treatment plant effluent · 2025 report, page 2 | 165 ppm | — | 250 ppm guideline | Within the guideline |
| Turbidity (cloudiness)average · range 0.1 to 0.7 · Distribution system · 2025 report, page 2 | 0.31 NTU | None set | 1 NTU | Below the legal limit |
| Alkalinityaverage · range 95 to 120 · R.E. Badger treatment plant effluent · 2025 report, page 2 | 106 ppm | None set | None | No health limit |
| Boronaverage · range 0.11 to 0.23 · R.E. Badger treatment plant effluent · 2025 report, page 2 | 0.16 ppm | None set | None | No health limit |
| Bromodichloromethaneaverage · range 4.2 to 18 · Distribution system · 2025 report, page 2 | 12.6 ppb | None set | None | No health limit |
| Bromoformaverage · range 1.3 to 4.2 · Distribution system · 2025 report, page 2 | 2.79 ppb | None set | None | No health limit |
| Calciumaverage · range 44 to 69 · R.E. Badger treatment plant effluent · 2025 report, page 2 | 55.5 ppm | None set | None | No health limit |
| Chloroformaverage · range 4.2 to 15 · Distribution system · 2025 report, page 2 | 10.4 ppb | None set | None | No health limit |
| Conductivityaverage · range 820 to 1,000 · R.E. Badger treatment plant effluent · 2025 report, page 2 | 893 µS/cm | None set | None | No health limit |
| Dibromochloromethaneaverage · range 4 to 28 · Distribution system · 2025 report, page 2 | 13 ppb | None set | None | No health limit |
| Hardnessaverage · range 11.7 to 16.4 · R.E. Badger treatment plant effluent · 2025 report, page 2 | 13.7 gpg (235 ppm) | — | — | Very hard |
| Magnesiumaverage · range 21 to 26 · R.E. Badger treatment plant effluent · 2025 report, page 2 | 23.3 ppm | None set | None | No health limit |
| PFBS (a PFAS)average · range ND to 2 · R.E. Badger treatment plant effluent · 2025 report, page 2 | 1 ppt | None set | None | No health limit |
| PFHxA (a PFAS)average · range ND to 2.4 · R.E. Badger treatment plant effluent · 2025 report, page 2 | 0.8 ppt | None set | None | No health limit |
| Potassiumaverage · range 4.1 to 4.8 · R.E. Badger treatment plant effluent · 2025 report, page 2 | 4.38 ppm | None set | None | No health limit |
| Radonaverage · range ND to 4.12 · R.E. Badger treatment plant effluent · 2025 report, page 2 | 2.45 pCi/L | None set | None | No health limit |
| Sodiumaverage · range 84 to 99 · R.E. Badger treatment plant effluent · 2025 report, page 2 | 89.5 ppm | None set | None | No health limit |
| Total organic carbonaverage · range 2.88 to 4.68 · R.E. Badger treatment plant effluent · 2025 report, page 2 | 3.45 ppm | None set | None | No health limit |
| Vanadiumaverage · range 2.1 to 2.6 · R.E. Badger treatment plant effluent · 2025 report, page 2 | 2.3 ppb | None set | None | No health limit |
Utility results describe the whole system, measured where water enters the pipes, not your tap. Your home’s plumbing can add lead or copper. 1 number we weren’t sure about is held back until a person checks.
EPA testing for PFAS and lithium
EPA’s own nationwide testing (UCMR 5) found these in Santa Fe I.D.’s water between Oct 2023 and Jul 2024. These are EPA lab results, separate from the district’s report. Anything not listed was not detected.
- Lithium39.8 ppbFound in 4 of 4 samples · highest resultAbove EPA’s health reference level of 10 ppb (a guide, not a legal limit)
Source: EPA UCMR 5 occurrence data. The highest single result is shown; one high sample doesn’t mean every glass is that high.
What you can do
Nothing here is an emergency notice: if the district has a violation, it must tell customers directly. If you’d like to lower these at your tap, these are the treatments that remove them, and the catalog shows the models certified for each. Ranking is by certified removal; commissions never change the order.
Copper
Found: Copper
What removes it: Reverse osmosis.
Radium and uranium
Found: Gross alpha (radioactivity), Gross beta (radioactivity), Radium-226, Radium-228
What removes it: Reverse osmosis.
PFAS ("forever chemicals")
Found: PFOA (a PFAS)
What removes it: Reverse osmosis.
Salty taste / high TDS
Found: Total dissolved solids
What removes it: Reverse osmosis.
More districts: California water quality · All states · Something look wrong? Tell us